top of page

Group

Public·90 members

Oracle Interview Questions And Answers For Freshers Pdf Free Download



There is the list of 300 core Java interview questions. If there is any core Java interview question that has been asked to you, kindly post it in the ask question section. We assure that you will get here the 90% frequently asked interview questions and answers.




Oracle Interview Questions And Answers For Freshers Pdf Free Download



The answers to the Core Java interview questions are short and to the point. The core Java interview questions are categorized in Basics of Java interview questions, OOPs interview questions, String Handling interview questions, Multithreading interview questions, collection interview questions, JDBC interview questions, etc.


Microsoft Certified Solution Associate is the certification program that provides the certification for the basic level by conducting exams based on the Windows Servers. There are many versions for Windows Servers where you will know about the different types of examinations conducted for the particular. To have a glance at the MCSA we are providing you with the MCSA interview questions and answers. MCSA is one of the crucial certifications to build our career and this certification makes you eligible for different designations including Computer Network Analyst, Database developer, and many more based on the exams offered by the MCSA certification program.


We hope you liked these HR interview questions and answers. In addition to these typical HR interview questions, you can see many more common or advanced questions in our complete interview questions library. It includes hundreds of questions about the HR interview and the next phases of the hiring process, by role and type.


Be cautious that your HR interview questions are about the workplace and the job role. Asking a candidate about their family life, medical issues, or even what they do with their free time could land you in hot water.


Find the comprehensive guide to Java interview questions and answers for both freshers and experienced professionals. Here, we have covered the top interview questions on Java that are likely to be asked when you appear for your job interview.


In this section, we have covered some basic Java interview questions and answers for freshers. If you have done a Java course and are looking to begin your career in this field, then ensure to go through these questions below.


Another important Java interview questions for freshers and experienced developers can be about the differences between Java and C++ programming languages. To help you understand it easily, we have created the following comparison between the both:


In case you have been doing your job for quite some time now and now looking to switch to a better opportunity, then here are the most asked core Java interview questions and answers for experienced developers or programmers. These are applicable to your profile if your experience ranges between 2 to 5 years.


If you have been searching for Java OOPS interview questions and answers, then this is going to be a top question. It is because inheritance is a crucial concept in Java related to object-oriented programming (OOP).


You can now also download our free Java programming interview questions and answers PDF. While going for the job interview, keep it handy on your smartphone or laptop so that you can revise things hassle-free.


We have added some very expected questions and appropriate answers to them. These are not mandatory ones but they have high chances of being asked in the interview. You can go through these questions to understand the pattern and way of answering the questions properly. With a better approach and right way of answering questions can help you excel in the interview. All the best!


Project on Human Development in Chicago \n Neighborhoods\n The Project on Human Development in Chicago Neighborhoods (PHDCN)\n was a large-scale, interdisciplinary study of how families, schools,\n and neighborhoods affect child and adolescent development. It was\n designed to advance the understanding of the developmental pathways of\n both positive and negative human social behaviors. In particular, the\n project examined the causes and pathways of juvenile delinquency,\n adult crime, substance abuse, and violence. At the same time, the\n project provided a detailed look at the environments in which these\n social behaviors took place by collecting substantial amounts of data\n about urban Chicago, including its people, institutions, and\n resources.\n Longitudinal Cohort Study\n One component of the PHDCN was the Longitudinal Cohort Study, which\n was a series of coordinated longitudinal studies that followed over\n 6,000 randomly selected children, adolescents, and young adults, and\n their primary caregivers over time to examine the changing\n circumstances of their lives, as well as the personal characteristics,\n that might lead them toward or away from a variety of antisocial\n behaviors. The age cohorts include birth (0), 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, and 18\n years. Numerous measures were administered to respondents to gauge\n various aspects of human development, including individual\n differences, as well as family, peer, and school influences.\n Conflict Tactics Scale for Partner and Spouse\n The data in this collection are from Wave 3 of the Longitudinal\n Cohort Study, which was administered between 2000 and 2002. The data\n files contain information from the Conflict Tactics Scale for Partner\n and Spouse (CTSP) protocol. The CTSP instrument (known in the field as\n simply, CTS) has been a widely used and cited quantitative measure of\n victimization in North American intimate partner relationships.\n Moreover, the CTSP measures both the extent to which partners in a\n dating, cohabiting, or marital relationship engage in psychological\n and physical attacks on one another, as well as their use of reasoning\n or negotiation to deal with conflicts. The purpose of the\n PHDCN-administered CTSP was to obtain information about different ways\n in which partners had handled arguments during the past year. The\n responses to conflict can be grouped into three types: verbal\nreasoning, verbal aggression, and physical violence.","collectionNotes":["(1) The Murray Research Center conducted the initial\n data and documentation processing for this collection. (2) At present,\n only a restricted version of the data is available (see RESTRICTIONS\n field). A downloadable version of the data is slated to be available\nin the near future."],"studyDesign":"Project on Human Development in Chicago \n Neighborhoods\n The city of Chicago was selected as the research site for the PHDCN\n because of its extensive racial, ethnic, and social-class diversity.\n The project collapsed 847 census tracts in the city of Chicago into\n 343 neighborhood clusters (NCs) based upon seven groupings of\n racial/ethnic composition and three levels of socioeconomic\n status. The NCs were designed to be ecologically meaningful. They were\n composed of geographically contiguous census tracts, and geographic\n boundaries, and knowledge of Chicago's neighborhoods were considered\n in the definition of the NCs. Each NC was comprised of approximately\n 8,000 people.\n Longitudinal Cohort Study\n For the Longitudinal Cohort Study, a stratified probability sample\n of 80 neighborhoods was selected. The 80 NCs were sampled from the 21\n strata (seven racial/ethnic groups by three socioeconomic levels) with\n the goal of representing the 21 cells as equally as possible to\n eliminate the confounding between racial/ethnic mix and socioeconomic\n status. Once the 80 NCs were chosen, then block groups were selected\n at random within each of the sample neighborhoods. A complete listing\n of dwelling units was collected for all sampled block groups.\n Pregnant women, children, and young adults in seven age cohorts\n (birth, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, and 18 years) were identified through\n in-person screening of approximately 40,000 dwelling units within the\n 80 NCs. The screening response rate was 80 percent. Children within\n six months of the birthday that qualified them for the sample were\n selected for inclusion in the Longitudinal Cohort Study. A total of\n 8,347 participants were identified through the screening. Of the\n eligible study participants, 6,228 were interviewed in the Wave 1 data\n collection, 5,338 were interviewed in the Wave 2 data collection, and\n 4,850 were interviewed in the Wave 3 data collection.\n Data collection for Wave 3 began in 2000 and ended in 2002. It\n included a letter sent to study participants notifying them that they\n would be contacted to schedule an interview. Additional information on\n the contact log included the dates and research assistant ID of the\n Wave 2 interview (or the status of the case if incomplete in Wave 2),\n a list of household composition and ID numbers of other household\n members in the study, the name the telephone was listed under, the\n recontact information from Waves 1 and 2, and an updated history of\n addresses.\n For all cohorts except 0 and 18, primary caregivers as well as the\n child were interviewed. The primary caregiver was the person found to\n spend the most time taking care of the child. Separate research\n assistants administered the primary caregiver interviews and the child\n interviews. The primary method of data collection was face-to-face\n interviewing, although participants who refused to complete the\n personal interview were administered a phone interview. An abbreviated\n telephone interview was conducted for the primary caregivers in\n Cohorts 0-15 and Cohort 18 study participants in Wave 3 who lived\n outside the nine-county metropolitan area to which research assistants\n were able to travel for interviews. In Wave 3, phone interviews were\n also conducted with the study participants in Cohort 15. People who\n refused to complete the two-hour in-person interview were administered\n the phone interview. A total of 391 telephone interviews were\n conducted during Wave 3, representing 6.3 percent of the sample.\n Proxy interviews were conducted with study participants who were\n emancipated minors (under 18 but married or living independently). The\n study participants answered questions from the primary caregiver's\n interview on the primary caregiver's behalf. In Wave 3, one primary\n caregiver and eleven study participants (young adults) were\n interviewed in jail. They were located in either the Cook County Jail\n or in one of the state prisons. Those study participants in a state\n system outside the nine-county area were also interviewed by\n phone. Study participants in foster care could not be interviewed. The\n Department of Children and Family Services did not allow interviews of\n the foster parent or the child. Permission was granted for a brief\n period in Wave 1, therefore there are some children in the sample who\n could not be followed up in Waves 2 and 3. Some children were not in\n foster care in Wave 1 but were placed in foster care by Wave 2 or\n 3. They were also not followed up. Lastly, some participants were\n interviewed in Wave 3 but not in Wave 2, as they were in foster care\n during Wave 2. Some participants in Wave 1 spoke a language\n other than English, Spanish, or Polish. In Wave 3, an abbreviated\n version of the primary caregiver's protocol was administered, and the\n research assistant arranged for someone in the household to translate\n on the spot. In Wave 3, the complete protocol was translated into\n Spanish.\n Depending on the age and wave of data collection, participants were\n paid between $5 and $20 per interview. Other incentives, such as free\n passes to museums, the aquarium, and monthly drawing prizes, were also\n included.\n Interview protocols included a wide range of questions. For\n example, some questions assessed impulse control and sensation-seeking\n traits, cognitive and language development, leisure activities,\n delinquency and substance abuse, friends' activities, and\n self-perception, attitudes, and values. Caregivers were also\n interviewed about family structure, parent characteristics,\n parent-child relationships, parent discipline styles, family mental\n health, and family history of criminal behavior and drug use.\n For primary caregivers included in Wave 3 but not in Wave 2, an\n addendum interview was administered consisting of measures or portions\n of measures from the Wave 2 interview. An addendum was also given to\n the Cohort 15 and 18 study participants who were not included in Wave\n 2. A total of 164 primary caregivers and 62 young adult (Cohorts 15\n and 18) addendums were completed in Wave 3.\n Conflict Tactics Scale for Partner and Spouse\n Between 2000 and 2002, the Conflict Tactics Scale for Partner and\n Spouse (CTSP) was completed by either the primary caregiver of\n subjects belonging to Cohorts 0, 3, 6, and 9, or by the subjects in\n Cohorts 15 and 18 of the PHDCN Longitudinal Cohort Study. It measured\n both the extent to which partners in a dating, cohabiting, or marital\n relationship engaged in psychological and physical attacks on each\n other and also their use of reasoning or negotiation to deal with\n conflicts. This Wave 3 study was modified from the Wave 1\n partner-spouse version of the Conflict Tactics Scale used in PROJECT\n ON HUMAN DEVELOPMENT IN CHICAGO NEIGHBORHOODS (PHDCN): CONFLICT\n TACTICS SCALE FOR PARTNER AND SPOUSE, WAVE 1, 1994-1997 (ICPSR\n 13583). It is also related to PROJECT ON HUMAN DEVELOPMENT IN CHICAGO\n NEIGHBORHOODS (PHDCN): PHYSICAL ABUSE SCALE, WAVE 2, 1997-2000 (ICPSR\n13642).","description":"The Project on Human Development in Chicago Neighborhoods\n (PHDCN) was a large-scale, interdisciplinary study of how families,\n schools, and neighborhoods affect child and adolescent development.\n One component of the PHDCN was the Longitudinal Cohort Study, which\n was a series of coordinated longitudinal studies that followed over\n 6,000 randomly selected children, adolescents, and young adults, and\n their primary caregivers over time to examine the changing\n circumstances of their lives, as well as the personal characteristics,\n that might lead them toward or away from a variety of antisocial\n behaviors. Numerous measures were administered to respondents to\n gauge various aspects of human development, including individual\n differences, as well as family, peer, and school influences. One such\n measure was the Conflict Tactics Scale for Partner and Spouse. It was\n administered to subjects' primary caregivers in Cohorts 0, 3, 6, and 9\n and to subjects in Cohorts 15 and 18. It measured both the extent to\n which partners in a dating, cohabiting, or marital relationship engage\n in psychological and physical attacks on each other and also their use\n of reasoning or negotiation to deal with conflicts. This Wave 3 study\n was modified from the Wave 1 partner-spouse version of the Conflict\n Tactics Scale used in PROJECT ON HUMAN DEVELOPMENT IN CHICAGO\n NEIGHBORHOODS (PHDCN): CONFLICT TACTICS SCALE FOR PARTNER AND SPOUSE,\n WAVE 1, 1994-1997 (ICPSR 13583). It is also related to PROJECT ON\n HUMAN DEVELOPMENT IN CHICAGO NEIGHBORHOODS (PHDCN): PHYSICAL ABUSE\nSCALE, WAVE 2, 1997-2000 (ICPSR 13642).","jsonld":"\"funder\":[\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"name\":\"John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation\",\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"name\":\"United States Department of Health and Human Services. Administration for Children and Families. Child Care Bureau\",\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"name\":\"Harris Foundation\",\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"name\":\"United States Department of Health and Human Services. Administration for Children and Families. Head Start Bureau\",\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"name\":\"United States Department of Health and Human Services. National Institutes of Health. Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development\",\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"name\":\"United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. National Institute of Justice\",\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"name\":\"United States Department of Health and Human Services. National Institutes of Health. National Institute of Mental Health\",\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"name\":\"United States Department of Education. Office of Educational Research and Improvement\",\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"name\":\"Turner Foundation\"],\"identifier\":\" \",\"creator\":[\"affiliation\":[\"Harvard Medical School\"],\"@type\":\"Person\",\"name\":\"Earls, Felton J.\",\"affiliation\":[\"Scientific Director. Columbia University. Teacher's College. Center for the Study of Children and Families\"],\"@type\":\"Person\",\"name\":\"Brooks-Gunn, Jeanne\",\"affiliation\":[\"Scientific Director. University of Michigan. School of Education and Survey Research Center\"],\"@type\":\"Person\",\"name\":\"Raudenbush, Stephen W.\",\"affiliation\":[\"Scientific Director. Harvard University. Department of Sociology\"],\"@type\":\"Person\",\"name\":\"Sampson, Robert J.\"],\"keywords\":[\"abuse\",\"adolescents\",\"aggression\",\"caregivers\",\"child abuse\",\"child development\",\"childhood\",\"conflict resolution\",\"conflict\",\"domestic violence\",\"emotional problems\",\"family conflict\",\"family violence\",\"hostility\",\"intimate partner violence\",\"neighborhoods\",\"social behavior\",\"spouse abuse\",\"threats\",\"violence\"],\"citation\":\"Earls, Felton J., Brooks-Gunn, Jeanne, Raudenbush, Stephen W., and Sampson, Robert J. Project on Human Development in Chicago Neighborhoods (PHDCN): Conflict Tactics Scale for Partner and Spouse, Wave 3, 2000-2002. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor], 2007-02-22. \",\"@type\":\"Dataset\",\"description\":\"The Project on Human Development in Chicago Neighborhoods\\n (PHDCN) was a large-scale, interdisciplinary study of how families,\\n schools, and neighborhoods affect child and adolescent development.\\n One component of the PHDCN was the Longitudinal Cohort Study, which\\n was a series of coordinated longitudinal studies that followed over\\n 6,000 randomly selected children, adolescents, and young adults, and\\n their primary caregivers over time to examine the changing\\n circumstances of their lives, as well as the personal characteristics,\\n that might lead them toward or away from a variety of antisocial\\n behaviors. Numerous measures were administered to respondents to\\n gauge various aspects of human development, including individual\\n differences, as well as family, peer, and school influences. One such\\n measure was the Conflict Tactics Scale for Partner and Spouse. It was\\n administered to subjects' primary caregivers in Cohorts 0, 3, 6, and 9\\n and to subjects in Cohorts 15 and 18. It measured both the extent to\\n which partners in a dating, cohabiting, or marital relationship engage\\n in psychological and physical attacks on each other and also their use\\n of reasoning or negotiation to deal with conflicts. This Wave 3 study\\n was modified from the Wave 1 partner-spouse version of the Conflict\\n Tactics Scale used in PROJECT ON HUMAN DEVELOPMENT IN CHICAGO\\n NEIGHBORHOODS (PHDCN): CONFLICT TACTICS SCALE FOR PARTNER AND SPOUSE,\\n WAVE 1, 1994-1997 (ICPSR 13583). It is also related to PROJECT ON\\n HUMAN DEVELOPMENT IN CHICAGO NEIGHBORHOODS (PHDCN): PHYSICAL ABUSE\\nSCALE, WAVE 2, 1997-2000 (ICPSR 13642).\",\"dateModified\":\"Thu Feb 22 00:00:00 EST 2007\",\"spatialCoverage\":[\"United States\",\"Chicago\",\"Illinois\"],\"distribution\":[],\"@context\":\" \",\"version\":\"V1\",\"url\":\" \",\"datePublished\":\"Thu Feb 22 00:00:00 EST 2007\",\"license\":\" \",\"dateCreated\":\"2007-02-22 00:00:00.0\",\"temporalCoverage\":[\"2000 -- 2002\"],\"name\":\"Project on Human Development in Chicago Neighborhoods (PHDCN): Conflict Tactics Scale for Partner and S


About

Welcome to the group! You can connect with other members, ge...
Group Page: Groups_SingleGroup
bottom of page